September 2001

Uncovering the BBC's investigation of
the attack on the World Trade Centre
& the Pentagon

Greetings all inquiring minds.

The majority of what follows concerns the BBC’s breach of its Broadcasting Charter in their Feb. 2007 documentary “investigation” of events in New York and Washington in September 2001. [Link to Charter]

This critique is in a web file format with sections containing brief synopsis linked to greater detail as required. Main story BLACK BACKGROUND, supporting evidence, reference links and collateral stories WHITE BACKGROUND.

Firstly and most importantly this blog is NOT about what the BBC, Bush, Cheney, Condoleezza Rice and the corporate media call "conspiracy theories".

What follows draws attention to the way the slogan "conspiracy theory" has been spun through the media to provoke a Pavlov's Dog response to any inquiry about contradictions and omissions in the official explanations of events.

This very phrase lights up pathways in our brains that ring to the tune “paranoid stories by sad souls”. As if asking a question, how?, why?, who?, when?, where? constitutes evidence of psychological disturbance and flawed character, which is what the BBC explicitly labeled doubters and inquirers.

“if you tell a big enough lie and keep repeating it, people will believe it” Hitler (attributed)

This blog draws attention to several big lies; * like the BBC commentator telling you the computer scientist she is introducing and his project, are not funded by the government, when they were; ....[Link] ** presenting interviewees, supporting the official story, who are seriously compromised by conflict of interest; ....[Link] *** endorsing the Bush administration's excuse for the the absolute failures of the US "defence and intelligence systems" as SNAFU (situation normal all fu*ked up); ....[Link] **** the issue of Israeli and Jewish American involvement sidetracked by emotional blackmail and deliberate deception etc. etc. etc. ....[Link]

and the idea that:-

“Omission is the greatest form of lie” .............[LINK]
George Orwell

The BBC 911 Conspiracy Files programme left the most important, pivotal question out; How could the collapse of the twin tower have tested so many basic laws of physics without the involvement of sophisticated thermal cutting technology and demolition explosives ? [Link] If we are to believe the official explanation it is as though the Earth were flat not round, just for the day.

This blog draws attention to the gross imbalance of opinion with 14 interviewees, plus the BBC commentators, supporting the Bush administration's explanation throughout the hour long programme and 3 individuals, presented erroneously as representing 911 critics, alloted 7 minutes. [LINK]

Cautiously, this blog draws your attention to a web of connections between the BBC and the rapidly expanding Big Brother operations of US intelligence services monitoring; Facebook, MySpace, credit card transactions, e-mails, etc. etc. etc. [Link]

These networks are data mined to see " if the public mood is good or bad" ..... "whether they're ready for a revolution" (Army Sargent John Cupp USJFCOM Public Afairs). [Link]

or "mined" to assess how far the BBC
can go in manufacturing history -
instilling acquiescence to barbarous illegal
wars - with loss of civil rights -
all in the name of "fighting terrorism"

The BBC has run a four part Conspiracy Files series presented as a serious analysis of controversial events over the past decade: If you check the BBC web site you will find the programme page mocks any that question official versions of controversial events. “Incredibly" states the BBC "some believe the American Government allowed or actively helped the attacks” - then the tale of flawed paranoid souls [LINK]

Examining the BBC’s 911 story line and the analysis presented:

BBC trailer
"The Conspiracy Files travels across the United States to investigate, speaking to eye witnesses to separate fact from fiction"